GOP Counsel Harped On How Blasey Ford Came Forward With Claims, Not The Alleged Assault

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27:   Rachel Mitchell, the chief of the Special Victims Division of the Maricopa County attorney's office in Arizona, listens to opening statements prior to testimony from Christine Blasey Ford and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. Blasey Ford, a professor at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a party in 1982 when they were high school students in suburban Maryland.  (Photo by Andrew Harnik-Pool/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: Rachel Mitchell, the chief of the Special Victims Division of the Maricopa County attorney's office in Arizona, listens to opening statements prior to testimony from Christine Blasey ... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: Rachel Mitchell, the chief of the Special Victims Division of the Maricopa County attorney's office in Arizona, listens to opening statements prior to testimony from Christine Blasey Ford and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. Blasey Ford, a professor at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a party in 1982 when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. (Photo by Andrew Harnik-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
|
September 27, 2018 3:16 p.m.

The sex crimes prosecutor tapped by Judiciary Republicans to question Christine Blasey Ford about her Brett Kavanaugh allegations spent a relatively small amount of time asking Blasey Ford about the sex crime she alleged and more time on questions about the steps Blasey Ford took in coming forward with the allegation.

As Thursday’s hearing wore on, prosecutor Rachel Mitchell’s lines of questioning took increasingly bizarre turns, as she quizzed Blasey Ford about how she found her lawyers, who paid for her polygraph, her fears of flying and what interactions she had with GOP committee staff.

At times, it felt as if Mitchell was seeking to help Republicans’ prop up their defense of their handling of Blasey Ford’s allegations. Some of Mitchell’s questions also seemed to feed into the suggestion that Blasey Ford was being used by Democrats to smear Kavanaugh.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley’s office did not respond to TPM’s inquiry as to whether Judiciary Republicans offered Mitchell guidance for her line of questioning. Sen. John Cornyn told TPM that he “believed” Mitchell came up with the questions on her own.

An extended line of questioning from Mitchell focused on reports that Blasey Ford feared flying — which was used to explain why she had sought a delay in this week’s hearing.

“In fact you fly fairly frequently for your hobbies and you’ve had to fly for your work, is that true?” Mitchell asked.

“Correct, unfortunately,” Blasey Ford said.

Other parts of her questioning focused on Blasey Ford’s decision to first turn to her congresswoman, Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-CA), to offer the allegations and then through a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein. She followed up on those questions with inquiries about any other communications she might have had with other lawmakers, which seemed to confuse Blasey Ford.

“Did you or anyone on your behalf speak to any member of congress or congressional staff about these allegations?” Mitchell asked.

“I personally did not,” Blasey Ford responded

“So my question was did you or anybody on your behalf?” Mitchell pressed

“What do you mean? Did someone speak for me?” Blasey Ford asked in response.

“Somebody that is working with you, or helping you, did somebody at your behest, on your behalf, speak to someone in Congress or staff?” Mitchell clarified.

“I’m not sure. I’m not sure how those exchanges went but I did not speak to anyone,” Blasey Ford answered.

On repeated occasions, Mitchell brought up the polygraph to which Blasey Ford submitted. She quizzed Blasey Ford on who advised her to sit for it, and how she paid for it. At times Blasey Ford was flummoxed by the questions — she said she didn’t know yet who paid for it — until her lawyer Deborah Katz interjected that her legal team covered the cost of the examination.

Mitchell also questioned Blasey Ford on who was paying her legal fees.

“It’s my understanding that some of my team is working on a pro bono basis, but I don’t know the exact details,” Blasey Ford said, before her attorney Michael Bromwich confirmed that both he and Katz are representing her pro bono.

Mitchell wrapped up her questioning with a wind up about the best practices for interview trauma victims and how those interviews are usually done with a trained expert in a private setting that let’s the victim lead the conversation, instead of the five minute increments of questioning at Thursday’s hearing.

Mitchell asked Blasey Ford to confirm that she was advised to get an attorney, who in turn advised her to take the polygraph.

“Instead of submitting to an interview in California, we’re having an hearing here today in five minute increments, is that right?” Mitchell asked as her final question.

There were audible gasps in the room.

Comments
Masthead Masthead
Editor & Publisher:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporter:
Senior Newswriters:
Newswriters:
Editor at Large:
General Manager & General Counsel:
Executive Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Publishing Associate:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer: