Nadler Is Seriously Considering ‘Very Large’ Fines For Subpoena Defiers

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 09: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) attends a news conference on April 9, 2019 in Washington, DC. House Democrats unveiled new letters to the Attorney General, HHS S... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 09: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) attends a news conference on April 9, 2019 in Washington, DC. House Democrats unveiled new letters to the Attorney General, HHS Secretary, and the White House demanding the production of documents related to Americans health care in the Texas v. United States lawsuit. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
|
May 15, 2019 3:05 p.m.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said Wednesday that he is seriously considering imposing fines, via the arcane congressional authority known as inherent contempt, for those resisting the House’s subpoenas.

Asked by reporters on Capitol Hill whether this would include Attorney General Bill Barr — whom Nadler’s committee recently recommended should be held in contempt by the full House — Nadler said “it would be for anybody who is held in inherent contempt.”

Barr has resisted a Democratic subpoena that he turn over the unredacted report submitted by special counsel Robert Mueller, as well as the underlying materials. But he is not the only administration figure who has blown off a request by House Democrats for documents.

“Inherent contempt is a procedure for enforcing a subpoena of the House,” Nadler said. “It was the main procedure was used for 150 years. And we may have to do it again.”

It was last used nearly 100 years ago, but the idea has gained traction given President Trump’s blanket stonewalling of oversight request from House Democrats. Congress also has the option of detaining subpoena defiers under inherent contempt, but given the logistical issues of that route, much of the conversation on the Hill has centered around using inherent contempt to impose fines.

Nadler said the idea is being considered in addition to the use of civil contempt, a process by which a court is asked to impose penalties for the defiance of the subpoena.

Nadler couldn’t put an exact dollar amount on the hypothetical fines, but said he they would be “very large amounts.”

Latest Dc
Important Update On Comments

Beginning May 1, 2021, the option to comment on an article will be reserved only for TPM members. Non-members and those with free accounts will still be able to read comments both past and present, but will no longer be able to participate. We didn’t come to this decision lightly. Lively dicussion amongst our readers is a critical component of TPM. But in the interest of strengthening and sustaining these discussions, we determined this was the best way forward.

We hope that dedicated participants in the comments will join us as members, and want to make it as easy as possible for you to to so. So we are offering 40% OFF an annual Prime membership to TPM readers with commenting accounts.

We also offer FREE memberships to those experiencing financial hardship and FREE memberships for students.

View all options
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer:
SPECIAL DEAL FOR PAST TPM MEMBERS
40% OFF AN ANNUAL PRIME MEMBERSHIP
REJOIN FOR JUST $30